----- Original Message ----- > From: "Omer Frenkel" <[email protected]> > To: "Federico Simoncelli" <[email protected]> > Cc: "oVirt Users List" <[email protected]>, "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 4:31:56 PM > Subject: Re: oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions > > Thanks for the feedback! much appreciated. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Federico Simoncelli" <[email protected]> > > To: "oVirt Users List" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Omer Frenkel" <[email protected]>, "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 5:12:38 PM > > Subject: oVirt 3.4 test day - Template Versions > > > > Feature tested: > > > > http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Template_Versions > > > > - create a new vm vm1 and make a template template1 from it > > - create a new vm vm2 based on template1 and make some changes > > - upgrade to 3.4 > > - create a new template template1.1 from vm2 > > - create a new vm vm3 from template1 (clone) - content ok > > - create a new vm vm4 from template1.1 (thin) - content ok > > - create a new vm vm5 from template1 last (thin) - content ok (same as 1.1) > > - try to remove template1 (failed as template1.1 is still present) > > - try to remove template1.1 (failed as vm5 is still present) > > - create a new vm vm6 and make a template blank1.1 as new version of the > > blank template (succeeded) > > - create a vm pool vmpool1 with the "latest" template from template1 > > - create a vm pool vmpool2 with the "template1.1" (last) template from > > template1 > > - start vmpool1 and vmpool2 and verify that the content is the same > > - create a new template template1.2 > > - start vmpool1 and verify that the content is the same as latest > > (template1.2) > > - start vmpool2 and verify that the content is the same as template1.1 > > > > Suggestions: > > > > - the template blank is special, I am not sure if allowing versioning may > > be confusing (for example is not even editable) > > right, i also thought about this, and my thought was not to block the user > from doing this, > but if it was confusing we better block it. > > > - as far as I can see the "Sub Version Name" is not editable anymore (after > > picking it) > > thanks, i see its missing in the UI, do you care to open a bug on that?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058501 -- Federico _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
