Hi,
During test day I've tested Martik Betak's feature "Enable configuration of maximum allowed downtime during live migration per guest" ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1055434 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055434>).
For the tests I've created new VMs and tested the following:

_Webadmin_
- All newly added components to the Virtual Machine popup under the Host tab appear correctly and well aligned with the rest of the components - OK - The checkbox component of "Use custom migration downtime" works correctly and grays out the input box when unchecked - OK - The data entered in the input box is validated for input that does not consist of numbers, empty value, a number not in the range or a negative number - OK - The valid number entered in the input is updated correctly in the database - OK - An existing migration downtime value is displayed correctly when editing the VM - OK - When unchecking the checkbox and saving the property in the database is nullified - OK
_
__REST API_
- The valid number entered in the " migration_downtime" field is updated correctly in the database - OK - An existing migration downtime value is displayed correctly when GETting the VM - OK
- A non existing migration downtime value of a VM is displayed as "-1" - OK
- Updating an existing migration downtime of a VM to "-1" nullifies the value in the database - OK

_VDSM_
The correct migration downtime value set in the VM is transferred correctly to "vmMigrate" command "downtime" parameter - OK


Summary: All the tests went ok without failures but during the test I've found a bug regardless to the tests scope, when I tested a change of the migration downtime in the cluster level it turns our that the value set for the cluster custom properties via webadmin is not updated in the database, a bug was opened for that issue - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1058703 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058703>


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to