On 02/03/2014 12:06 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/03/2014 07:35 AM, Sahina Bose wrote:

On 02/03/2014 05:02 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 02/02/2014 08:01 PM, Jon Archer wrote:
Hi All,

Constantly seeing this message in the logs:
vdsm vds ERROR vdsm exception occured#012Traceback (most recent call
last):#012  File "/usr/share/vdsm/BindingXMLRPC.py", line 952, in
wrapper#012    res = f(*args, **kwargs)#012  File
"/usr/share/vdsm/gluster/api.py", line 54, in wrapper#012 rv =
func(*args, **kwargs)#012  File "/usr/share/vdsm/gluster/api.py", line
306, in tasksList#012    status =
self.svdsmProxy.glusterTasksList(taskIds)#012  File
"/usr/share/vdsm/supervdsm.py", line 50, in __call__#012 return
callMethod()#012  File "/usr/share/vdsm/supervdsm.py", line 48, in
<lambda>#012    **kwargs)#012  File "<string>", line 2, in
glusterTasksList#012  File
"/usr/lib64/python2.6/multiprocessing/managers.py", line 740, in
_callmethod#012    raise convert_to_error(kind,
result)#012GlusterCmdExecFailedException: Command execution
failed#012error: tasks is not a valid status option#012Usage: volume
status [all | <VOLNAME> [nfs|shd|<BRICK>]]
[detail|clients|mem|inode|fd|callpool]#012return code: 1


looks like an option which isn't recognised by the "gluster volume
status" command.

Any ideas how to resolve? It's not causing any problems, but I would
like to stop it.

Cheers

Jon
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

sahina - iirc, there is a patch removing that noise?

Yes, there was a patch removing this for clusters < 3.4 compatibility
version

For 3.4 gluster clusters, we need a version of gluster (>= 3.5) to
support the gluster async task feature. This version has the support for
"gluster volume status tasks"



was this backported to stable 3.3 ?

Unfortunately, no - missed this.

Have submitted a patch now - http://gerrit.ovirt.org/23982


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to