Thanks, I will take a look at it, anyone else currently using Gluster for backend images in production?
><> nathan stratton | vp technology | broadsoft, inc | +1-240-404-6580 | www.broadsoft.com On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Itamar Heim <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/09/2014 01:28 PM, Nathan Stratton wrote: > >> So I understand that the news is still fresh and there may not be much >> going on yet in making Ceph work with ovirt, but I thought I would reach >> out and see if it was possible to hack them together and still use >> librdb rather then NFS. >> >> I know, why not just use Gluster... the problem is I have tried to use >> Gluster for VM storage for years and I still don't think it is ready. >> Ceph still has work in other areas, but this is one area where I think >> it shines. This is a new lab cluster and I would like to try to use ceph >> over gluster if possible. >> >> Unless I am missing something, can anyone tell me they are happy with >> Gluster as a backend image store? This will be a small 16 node 10 gig >> cluster of shared compute / storage (yes I know people want to keep them >> separate). >> >> ><> >> nathan stratton | vp technology | broadsoft, inc | +1-240-404-6580 | >> www.broadsoft.com <http://www.broadsoft.com> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > there was a threat about this recently. afaict, ceph support will require > adding a specific ceph storage domain to engine and vdsm, which is a full > blown feature (I assume you could try and hack it somewhat with a custom > hook). waiting for next version planning cycle to see if/how it gets pushed. >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
