Thanks. It is on my centos host which is located deep in my NW.
Regards, Niklas > On 15 jul 2014, at 16:41, "White Hat" <whitehat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes it can be disabled, but why not just add the rules you need to > make it work properly? > > Are you asking about iptables on the host or the guest? Are you > actually using firewalld, or is it really iptables? > > You can add a log statement before the reject rule in > /etc/sysconfig/iptables to log a message to /var/log/messages to show > what is being blocked. > > Then you can open those ports that show up in your log as necessary. > > For example: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21771684/iptables-log-and-drop-in-one-rule > > HTH > >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Niklas Fondberg <nik...@vireone.com> wrote: >> Correction of my bad english... >> "can iptables be disabled if I never plan to use NAT:d guests?" >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
