Chandrahasa: (Apologies for the delayed reply, I was on vacation.)
This is an ongoing debate in the oVirt community. On the one hand, a forum would lend itself well to the benefits you describe, but on the other hand, the community has grown comfortable with the mailing list format. We have considered both, but separate "channels" could divert attention away from either channel. Currently, we are exploring an upcoming Mailman 3 tool, known as hyperkitty, which should enable using the mailing list content much more like a forum. This *should* give us the kind of access you are describing. Peace, BKP ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandrahasa S" <chandrahas...@tcs.com> > To: users-boun...@ovirt.org, users@ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:09:42 AM > Subject: [ovirt-users] Why Ovirt do not have - User community Forum > > Dear All, > > Why we do not have Ovirt Forum like CentOS. Where I can see all reported / > solved issues. > > CentOS forum is : https://www.centos.org/forums/ > > Regards, > Chandrahasa S > Tata Consultancy Services > Data Center- ( Non STPI) > 2nd Pokharan Road, > Subash Nagar , > Mumbai - 400601,Maharashtra > India > Ph:- +91 22 677-81825 > Buzz:- 4221825 > Mailto: chandrahas...@tcs.com > Website: http://www.tcs.com > ____________________________________________ > Experience certainty. IT Services > Business Solutions > Consulting > ____________________________________________ > > > > From: Federico Simoncelli <fsimo...@redhat.com> > To: Daniel Helgenberger <daniel.helgenber...@m-box.de> > Cc: users@ovirt.org > Date: 08/05/2014 06:51 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] SPM in oVirt 3.6 > Sent by: users-boun...@ovirt.org > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nir Soffer" <nsof...@redhat.com> > > To: "Daniel Helgenberger" <daniel.helgenber...@m-box.de> > > Cc: users@ovirt.org, "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimo...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 6:43:30 PM > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] SPM in oVirt 3.6 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Daniel Helgenberger" <daniel.helgenber...@m-box.de> > > > To: users@ovirt.org > > > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 7:51:33 PM > > > Subject: [ovirt-users] SPM in oVirt 3.6 > > > > > > just out of pure curiosity: In a BZ [1] Allon mentions SPM will go away > > > in ovirt 3.6. > > > > > > This seems like a major change for me. I assume this will replace > > > sanlock as well? What will SPM be replaced with? > > > > No, sanlock is not going anywhere. > > > > The change is that we will not have an SPM node, but any node that need to > > make meta data changes, will take a lock using sanlock while it make the > > changes. > > > > Federico: can you describe in more details how it is going to work? > > Most of the information can be found on the feature page: > > http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Decommission_Master_Domain_and_SPM > > -- > Federico > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > =====-----=====-----===== > Notice: The information contained in this e-mail > message and/or attachments to it may contain > confidential or privileged information. If you are > not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, > review, distribution, printing or copying of the > information contained in this e-mail message > and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If > you have received this communication in error, > please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and > immediately and permanently delete the message > and any attachments. Thank you > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users