Do you have any metrics to give an idea of the difference. I am using NFS
right now, and I am migrating to Gluster. I have the gluster system up, and
I see that it seems to provision disks faster than my NFS. I haven't used
any real measurement tools to get actual metrics, this is all perceived. 

 

Do you have an operational gluster?

Do what are you using right now?

 

Donny D

cloudspin.me

 

From: users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] On Behalf Of
Yue, Cong
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 10:57 AM
To: users@ovirt.org
Subject: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage
for VMs

 

Hi 

 

I have one question about whether GlusterFS is the suitable solution to be
used as the block storage for VMs.

The failure tolerant and scalability is good for GlusterFS, but in my test,
it seems the iops is pretty bad. In some blog, it said, it is even with
worse performance than normal NFS.

Should I use iscsi+drbd for the block storage for VMs.

Can somebody give some advice for this? 

 

Thanks,
Cong

 

  _____  

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of the original message. If you are the intended recipient, please be
advised that the content of this message is subject to access, review and
disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to