On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:58:53AM -0600, Darrell Budic wrote: > I believe the supervdsm leak was fixed, but 3.5.1 versions of vdsmd still > leaks slowly, ~300k/hr, yes. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158108 > > > > On Mar 6, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net> wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, Federico Alberto Sayd <fs...@uncu.edu.ar> said: > >> I am experiencing troubles with VDSM memory consuption. > >> > >> I am running > >> > >> Engine: ovirt 3.5.1 > >> > >> Nodes: > >> > >> Centos 6.6 > >> VDSM 4.16.10-8 > >> Libvirt: libvirt-0.10.2-46 > >> Kernel: 2.6.32 > >> > >> When the host boots, memory consuption is normal, but after 2 or 3 > >> days running, VDSM memory consuption grows and it consumes more > >> memory that all vm's running in the host. If I restart the vdsm > >> service, memory consuption normalizes, but then it start growing > >> again. > >> > >> I have seen some BZ about vdsm and supervdsm about memory leaks, but > >> I don't know if VDSM 4.6.10.8 is still affected by a related bug. > > > > Can't help, but I see the same thing with CentOS 7 nodes and the same > > version of vdsm. > > -- > > Chris Adams <c...@cmadams.net> > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users@ovirt.org > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I'm afraid that we are yet to find a solution for this issue, which is completly different from the horrible leak of supervdsm < 4.16.7. Could you corroborate the claim of Bug 1147148 - M2Crypto usage in vdsm leaks memory ? Does the leak disappear once you start using plaintext transport? Regards, Dan. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users