i expect that you are aware of the fact that you only get the write performance of a single disk in that configuration? i whould drop that pool configuration, drop the spare drives and go for a mirror pool.
Am 22.04.2015 um 11:39 schrieb Maikel vd Mosselaar: > pool: z2pool > state: ONLINE > scan: scrub canceled on Sun Apr 12 16:33:38 2015 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > z2pool ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c0t5000C5004172A87Bd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c0t5000C50041A59027d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c0t5000C50041A592AFd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c0t5000C50041A660D7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c0t5000C50041A69223d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c0t5000C50041A6ADF3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > logs > c0t5001517BB2845595d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > cache > c0t5001517BB2847892d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > spares > c0t5000C50041A6B737d0 AVAIL > c0t5000C50041AC3F07d0 AVAIL > c0t5000C50041AD48DBd0 AVAIL > c0t5000C50041ADD727d0 AVAIL > > errors: No known data errors > > > On 04/22/2015 11:17 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote: >> On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 11:12 +0200, Maikel vd Mosselaar wrote: >>> Our pool is configured as Z1 with ZIL (normal SSD), the sync parameter >>> is on the default setting (standard) so "sync" is on. >> # zpool status ? >> >> /K >> >>> When the issue happens oVirt event viewer shows indeed latency warnings. >>> Not always but most of the time this will be followed by an i/o storage >>> error linked to random VMs and they will be paused when that happens. >>> >>> All the nodes use mode 4 bonding. The interfaces on the nodes don't show >>> any drops or errors, i checked 2 of the VMs that got paused the last >>> time it happened they have dropped packets on their interfaces. >>> >>> We don't have a subscription with nexenta (anymore). >>> >>> On 04/21/2015 04:41 PM, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: >>>> Am 21.04.2015 um 16:19 schrieb Maikel vd Mosselaar: >>>>> Hi Juergen, >>>>> >>>>> The load on the nodes rises far over >200 during the event. Load on >>>>> the >>>>> nexenta stays normal and nothing strange in the logging. >>>> ZFS + NFS could be still the root of this. Your Pool Configuration is >>>> RaidzX or Mirror, with or without ZIL? The sync Parameter of your ZFS >>>> Subvolume which gets exported is kept default on "standard" ? >>>> >>>> http://christopher-technicalmusings.blogspot.de/2010/09/zfs-and-nfs-performance-with-zil.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Since Ovirt acts very sensible about Storage Latency (throws VM into >>>> unresponsive or unknown state) it might be worth a try to do "zfs set >>>> sync=disabled pool/volume" to see if this changes things. But be aware >>>> that this makes the NFS Export vuln. against dataloss in case of >>>> powerloss etc, comparable to async NFS in Linux. >>>> >>>> If disabling the sync setting helps, and you dont use a seperate ZIL >>>> Flash Drive yet -> this whould be very likely help to get rid of this. >>>> >>>> Also, if you run a subscribed Version of Nexenta it might be helpful to >>>> involve them. >>>> >>>> Do you see any messages about high latency in the Ovirt Events Panel? >>>> >>>>> For our storage interfaces on our nodes we use bonding in mode 4 >>>>> (802.3ad) 2x 1Gb. The nexenta has 4x 1Gb bond in mode 4 also. >>>> This should be fine, as long as no Node uses Mode0 / Round Robin which >>>> whould lead to out of order TCP Packets. The Interfaces themself dont >>>> show any Drops or Errors - on the VM Hosts as well as on the Switch >>>> itself? >>>> >>>> Jumbo Frames? >>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> >>>>> Maikel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 04/21/2015 02:51 PM, InterNetX - Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> how about Load, Latency, strange dmesg messages on the Nexenta ? >>>>>> You are >>>>>> using bonded Gbit Networking? If yes, which mode? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Juergen >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 20.04.2015 um 14:25 schrieb Maikel vd Mosselaar: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are running ovirt 3.5.1 with 3 nodes and seperate engine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All on CentOS 6.6: >>>>>>> 3 x nodes >>>>>>> 1 x engine >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1 x storage nexenta with NFS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For multiple weeks we are experiencing issues of our nodes that >>>>>>> cannot >>>>>>> access the storage at random moments (atleast thats what the nodes >>>>>>> think). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When the nodes are complaining about a unavailable storage then >>>>>>> the load >>>>>>> rises up to +200 on all three nodes, this causes that all running >>>>>>> VMs >>>>>>> are unaccessible. During this process oVirt event viewer shows >>>>>>> some i/o >>>>>>> storage error messages, when this happens random VMs get paused >>>>>>> and will >>>>>>> not be resumed anymore (this almost happens every time but not >>>>>>> all the >>>>>>> VMs get paused). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> During the event we tested the accessibility from the nodes to the >>>>>>> storage and it looks like it is working normal, at least we can do a >>>>>>> normal >>>>>>> "ls" on the storage without any delay of showing the contents. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We tried multiple things that we thought it causes this issue but >>>>>>> nothing worked so far. >>>>>>> * rebooting storage / nodes / engine. >>>>>>> * disabling offsite rsync backups. >>>>>>> * moved the biggest VMs with highest load to different platform >>>>>>> outside >>>>>>> of oVirt. >>>>>>> * checked the wsize and rsize on the nfs mounts, storage and >>>>>>> nodes are >>>>>>> correct according to the "NFS troubleshooting page" on ovirt.org. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The environment is running in production so we are not free to test >>>>>>> everything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can provide log files if needed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kind Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maikel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
