On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Will Dennis <wden...@nec-labs.com> wrote:
> Looks like a pretty old request, too… if I may ask, is this a complicated > technical change, or is it just lower priority than other open issues? > Seems like if it was an easy change to make, it would be a big win for > users… > Nothing is easy as it looks (Murphy's law) ;-) There are cons and pros for moving the ISO (and the export domain) it to become a regular data domain (vs. the complete opposite - just making it a regular directory, not a domain or anything). - It definitely will require (better) management tools (compared to the basic ISO uploader and being able to easily rename & delete ISOs in the ISO domain). - It will provide better performance in some cases (does it matter for the ISO domain? Not sure). - It may relieve the need for NFS altogether (if you are using some other storage technology) - It will make sharing the domain more difficult across (put your favorite item here - data centers, products, continents...) - It will simplify the code in some areas. Y. > On Jan 10, 2016, at 3:15 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <d...@redhat.com<mailto: > d...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Will Dennis <wden...@nec-labs.com<mailto: > wden...@nec-labs.com>> wrote: > > Seems like there should be an easier way to consume an > external existing repository. > > Indeed, and we have an RFE for that: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034112 > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
