The price is nearly double ML10 v2 about 900€ and ML110 Gen9 about 1800€ but the ML10 has only 2 cores and the ML110 6 cores.
Thanks for the hints I will compare different vendors too. The use case is very simple: - 6 clients - 1 windows server to manage the clients - 1 linux server for nagios, controller for wifi and other stuff - 1 linux server for the firewall regards gregor On 17/01/16 14:23, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 2:56 PM, gregor <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I planned for a new customer to use oVirt instead of competitor > virtualization. > > Here are the environment: > > Server choices: > 1. HP ProLiant ML10 v2: 1x Dual Core 3,1GHz with 12GB RAM > 2. HP ProLiant ML110 Gen9: 1x Xeon 1,6GHz with 12GB RAM > > > What you really need to compare first of all are the processors, where > more cores is (usually) preferred, then memory speed and lastly, > expandability. > But of course, it really depends on budget and use case (for example, if > IO is critical, I'd spend more on higher performing drives / more drives > / caching). > There's no clear cut winner here, especially without knowing the price > difference and use case. > Y. > > > > Harddisk: > - Raid1 on two SATA 2TB drives > > Guests: > - 1x Windows Server Essentials 2012 R2 > - 2x CentOS 7 > > Clients: > - 6 Windows Clients > > Will the ML10 v2 server serve the needed performance? Because its a way > cheaper than the ML110. And will Windows Server 2012 run in oVirt, > because on my test machine (HP ProLiant ML350 G5) it didn't (maybe the > CPU is to old). > > regards > gregor > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
