Isn't teaming[1] the futur, instead of bonding ? [1] http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/06/23/team-driver/
> Le 27 juin 2016 à 14:31, Fernando Frediani <fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br> a > écrit : > > Thanks for the reply. > > Perhaps is the case of contacting the maintainer of Linux Bond module and see > if there is room for this feature to be implement anytime. OVS is great in > the coming future, but Bond module is still something very handy that > simplify the things a lot. > > Thanks > Fernando > > Em 27/06/2016 03:00, Edward Haas escreveu: >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky < >> <mailto:yzasp...@redhat.com>yzasp...@redhat.com >> <mailto:yzasp...@redhat.com>> wrote: >> Dan, Edy, >> >> Could you guys answer this? >> >> IIUC, the requirements are: >> stream the traffic of few VLANs(network roles) through a single bond >> be able to bind a VLAN to a bond slave with an option of fallback >> have redundancy >> assign different QoS to every VLAN (my addition) >> I guess this is a new RFC that we do not support currently, but would we be >> able to provide in any future? >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Fernando Frediani < >> <mailto:fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br >> <mailto:fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br>> >> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:17 PM >> Subject: [ovirt-users] Network redundancy with Manual balancing per VLAN >> To: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> In VMware it is possible to bond two network interfaces and for each >> Portgroup (equivalent to a VLAN) is possible to tell which of the physical >> interfaces underneath it you wish the traffic to flow primarily and which >> stays as secondary(bond mode=1 equivalent). So for certain VLANs >> (Management, Live Migration, etc) is possible to force traffic flow via one >> physical NIC of the bond and for other VLANs (Virtual Machine's traffic) >> outs via the other NIC with failover to each other should a cable or switch >> fails. >> >> This is specially good for better utilize the fewer NICs available and still >> have redundancy. >> >> In oVirt it is also possible to have bonds, but would it still be possible >> to do that same and favor the traffic per VLAN basis ? I guess it is >> something related to Linux Bond module but perhaps someone has done this >> already. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Fernando >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> >> >> >> Hello Fernando, >> >> As you mentioned, oVirt is using the Linux Bond and the solution you are >> looking for is not supported. >> The oVirt way to handle this is by applying QoS on the networks, providing >> the guaranteed rates for each and utilizing the bond for throughput beyond >> the one link limit. >> >> With the introduction of OVS as an alternative networking infrastructure for >> the hosts, you could create a hook that implements some special >> functionality, but ovs is not in yet. >> >> Thanks, >> Edy. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
