Really? That’s strange, as the engine should be backward compatible with 
previous versions no?

Anyway, I believe the devs :)

--

Dr Christophe Trefois, Dipl.-Ing.
Technical Specialist / Post-Doc

UNIVERSITÉ DU LUXEMBOURG

LUXEMBOURG CENTRE FOR SYSTEMS BIOMEDICINE
Campus Belval | House of Biomedicine
6, avenue du Swing
L-4367 Belvaux
T: +352 46 66 44 6124
F: +352 46 66 44 6949
http://www.uni.lu/lcsb

[Facebook]<https://www.facebook.com/trefex>  [Twitter] 
<https://twitter.com/Trefex>   [Google Plus] 
<https://plus.google.com/+ChristopheTrefois/>   [Linkedin] 
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/trefoischristophe>   [skype] 
<http://skype:Trefex?call>

----
This message is confidential and may contain privileged information.
It is intended for the named recipient only.
If you receive it in error please notify me and permanently delete the original 
message and any copies.
----



On 24 Aug 2016, at 11:09, Barak Korren 
<bkor...@redhat.com<mailto:bkor...@redhat.com>> wrote:



On 23 August 2016 at 19:09, Christophe TREFOIS 
<christophe.tref...@uni.lu<mailto:christophe.tref...@uni.lu>> wrote:
Small add.

Shouldnt one update the engine first ?

Nope.
You should always update the hosts first. The other way around can work but 
AFAIK this is what is being tested.


--
Barak Korren
bkor...@redhat.com<mailto:bkor...@redhat.com>
RHEV-CI Team

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to