> Le 9 avr. 2017 à 11:25, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> a écrit :

> However, I tend to agree with closing the bug - I'd create a library (module) 
> *on top of the SDK* . The comment in the bug is quite clear about it:
> "The objective of the SDK is to offer the same that the API offers, without 
> the burden of the details of the HTTP and XML handling. Nothing less, and 
> nothing more."

Then don't call it a SDK, they are barely helper functions with bad design 
decisions, connection.vms_service().vm_service(id) is nothing else than 
redundancy and bring nothing else than noise. 

Users mailing list

Reply via email to