Hi all,
Potentially stupid question here. Sorry in advance if so. I have always built out full blown multi rack instances of oVirt, and RHEV for clients, but the following question has me wondering before I go digging and trying it out... I realize that the oVirtLive ISO is for demo purposes, sandboxing, and not production: I have a client, who is in need of a bootable AIO-based USB install with the caveat of being able to connect to the computer's HD and other external storage at that point (for the Storage and ISO domains that I'll create afterwards). This is because they have one BM to work with and they don't want the extra overhead using an SSD HD slot. They don't want to use a Sata DOM either if possible. In saying that, and concerning the oVirt LiveISO capabilities - I have two questions. - Does the AIO USB install load necessary runtimes into memory, similar to esxi bootable USBs and utilize the base hardware afterwards so that the rest of the operations are ran in memory, hitting the disk (USB in this case) like a normal OS load when needed for kernel calls, etc..?? - Are there a terrible performance costs if we stay with USB3 (which has a ridiculous theoretical speed in certain hardware matching situations)? Thanks in advance for anyone who might have already crossed this bridge and can provide insight. Michael J. McConachie | keys.fedoraproject.org | PubKey: 0x7BCD88F8 NOTE: The information included and/or attached in this electronic mail transmission may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, distribution or the taking of action in reliance on the contents of the information are strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please notify the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying, disclosing or forwarding.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
