Hi, The GA iso is 4.1-2017070915
Thanks, Yuval. On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Vinícius Ferrão <[email protected]> wrote: > May I ask another question? > > I’ve noted two new ISO images of 4.1.3 Node version over here: > http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.1/iso/ovirt- > node-ng-installer-ovirt/ > > Which one is the stable version: > 4.1-2017070915 <(201)%20707-0915> > 4.1-2017070913 <(201)%20707-0913> > > Thanks, > V. > > On 9 Jul 2017, at 13:26, Lev Veyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Vinicius, > > It's actually due to my mistake, and as result the package got tagged with > the RC version instead of the GA. > The package itself was based on the 4.1.3 code, though. > I rebuilt it and published a fixed package, so the issue should be > resolved now. > > Thanks in advance, > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Vinícius Ferrão <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I’ve noted a strange thing on oVirt. On the Hosted Engine an update was >> offered and I was a bit confused, since I’m running the latest oVirt Node >> release. >> >> To check if 4.1.3 was already released I issued an “yum update” on the >> command line and for my surprise an RC release was offered. This not seems >> to be right: >> >> ============================================================ >> ========================================================== >> Package Arch Version >> Repository Size >> ============================================================ >> ========================================================== >> Installing: >> ovirt-node-ng-image-update noarch >> 4.1.3-0.3.rc3.20170622082156.git47b4302.el7.centos >> ovirt-4.1 544 M >> replacing ovirt-node-ng-image-update-placeholder.noarch >> 4.1.2-1.el7.centos >> Updating: >> ovirt-engine-appliance noarch 4.1-20170622.1.el7.centos >> ovirt-4.1 967 M >> >> Transaction Summary >> ============================================================ >> ========================================================== >> Install 1 Package >> Upgrade 1 Package >> >> Total download size: 1.5 G >> Is this ok [y/d/N]: N >> >> Is this normal behavior? This isn’t really good, since it can lead to >> stable to unstable moves on production. If this is normal, how can we avoid >> it? >> >> Thanks, >> V. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > > -- > > Lev Veyde > > Software Engineer, RHCE | RHCVA | MCITP > Red Hat Israel > > <https://www.redhat.com/> > > [email protected] | [email protected] > <https://red.ht/sig> > TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> > > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
