hi Yaniv, yes for sure I hit some cache in between but not the vm cache, it has a 4GB ram, with oflag=direct I get about 120MB/s
for the data analysis the cache is our friend:) The backend is a lustrefs 2.10.x. yes we have dedicated 10G on the hosts, where we can limit the vm interface to 10Gbit? Am 19.11.2017 8:33 nachm. schrieb "Yaniv Kaul" <yk...@redhat.com>: On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Arman Khalatyan <arm2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, in our environment we got pretty good io performance on VM, with > following configuration: > lustrebox: /lust mounted on "GATEWAY" over IB > GATEWAY: export /lust as nfs4 on 10G interface > VM(test.vm): import as NFS over 10G interface > > [r...@test.vm <r...@gans.vm> ~]# dd if=/dev/zero bs=128K count=100000 > Without oflag=direct, you are hitting (somewhat) the cache. > > of=/test/tmp/test.tmp > 100000+0 records in > 100000+0 records out > 13107200000 <(310)%20720-0000> bytes (13 GB) copied, 20.8402 s, 629 MB/s > looks promising for the future deployments. > Very - what's the backend storage? > > only one problem remains that on heavy io I get some wornings that the vm > network is saturated, are there way to configure the bandwidth limits to > 10G for the VM Interface?? > Yes, but you really need a dedicated storage interface, no? Y. > > > thank you beforehand, > Arman. > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
