Dear Luca, Sorry for the very late reply..
I want to try out now your mentions. Should I make an interconnect the two switches in active/backup mode? Thanks! Tibor ----- 2017. dec.. 12., 19:35, Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto <lorenzetto.l...@gmail.com> írta: > Hi, > If you're looking at a simple ha bonding setup, why not using active-backup > (mode 1)? > We're using it in almost all our setups and switches toin backup interface in > 100ms when a link down is detected (Setting miimon=100). > Doesn't aggregate bandwidth but is a very good solution for high availability > whwn you can't configure lacp or a portchannel on switch side. > Luca > Il 12 dic 2017 7:06 PM, "Demeter Tibor" < [ mailto:tdeme...@itsmart.hu | > tdeme...@itsmart.hu ] > ha scritto: >> Hi, >> Thanks for the answers. >> In this case the only question is: what is better for me? Mode 5 or 6? >> In which modes how is fast the switching? >> Until now I've use 802.3ad lacp on our old cluster. I did some tests and it >> was >> very fast. I know it is not same, but mode 5 or 6 how is safe? >> Thanks >> Regards, >> Tibor >> ----- 2017. dec.. 11., 13:24, Simone Tiraboschi < [ >> mailto:stira...@redhat.com | >> stira...@redhat.com ] > írta: >>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Demeter Tibor < [ >>> mailto:tdeme...@itsmart.hu | >>> tdeme...@itsmart.hu ] > wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> Could help anyone for me in this question? >>>> Thanks. >>>> R. >>>> Tibor >>>> ----- 2017. dec.. 6., 14:07, Demeter Tibor < [ mailto:tdeme...@itsmart.hu | >>>> tdeme...@itsmart.hu ] > írta: >>>>> Dear members, >>>>> I would like to use two switch to make high-availability network >>>>> connection for >>>>> my nfs storage. >>>>> Unfortunately, these switches does not support [ http://802.3.ad/ | >>>>> 802.3.ad ] >>>>> lacp, (really I can't stack them) but I've read about mode-alb and >>>>> mode-tlb >>>>> bonding modes. >>>>> I know,these modes are available in ovirt, but how is work that? Also how >>>>> is >>>>> safe? Are there for HA or for load balance? >>>>> I've read some forums, where does not recommended these modes to use in >>>>> ovirt. >>>>> What is the truths? >>>>> I would like to use only for storage-traffic, it will be separated from >>>>> other >>>>> network traffic. I have two 10Gbe switches and two 10Gbe ports in my >>>>> nodes. >>> Look here: >>> [ >>> https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/admin-guide/chap-Logical_Networks/#bonds-1 >>> | >>> https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/admin-guide/chap-Logical_Networks/#bonds-1 >>> ] >>> "Important: Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4 support both virtual machine (bridged) and >>> non-virtual machine (bridgeless) network types. Modes 0, 5 and 6 support >>> non-virtual machine (bridgeless) networks only.¨ >>> So both tlb (mode 5) or alb (mode 6) are fine only if you use them just for >>> the >>> storage access but not for VMs. >>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>> R >>>>> Tibor >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Users mailing list >>>>> [ mailto:Users@ovirt.org | Users@ovirt.org ] >>>>> [ http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users | >>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ] >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> [ mailto:Users@ovirt.org | Users@ovirt.org ] >>>> [ http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users | >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ] >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [ mailto:Users@ovirt.org | Users@ovirt.org ] >> [ http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users | >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users ]
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
