Thank you, that's a much better idea. On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 4:15 AM Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018, 4:14 AM Colin Coe <colin....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I suspect one of our hypervisors is faulty but at this stage I can't >> prove it. >> >> We're running RHV 4.1.7 (about to upgrade to v4.1.10 in a few days). >> >> I'm planning on create a negative host affinity rule to prevent all >> current existing VMs from running on the suspect host. Afterwards I'll >> create a couple of test VMs and put them in a positive host affinity rule >> so they only run on the suspect host. >> >> There are about 150 existing VMs, are there any known problems with host >> affinity rules and putting 150 or so VMs in the group? >> >> This is production so I need to be careful. >> > > Why not move it to maintenance, then create a new test cluster for it and > use it for testing? > Y. > > >> Thanks >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
