Also keep in mind that extensive logging in the vm's can seriously impact your fs performance, so using a central syslogserver is a really good idea.
/tony On 2018-04-06 17:03, Karli Sjöberg wrote: > > > Den 6 apr. 2018 15:46 skrev Jayme <jay...@gmail.com>: > > Yaniv, > > I appreciate your input, thanks! > > I understand that everyone's use case is different, but I was hoping > to hear from some users that are using oVirt hyper-converged setup > and get some input on the performance. When I research GlusterFS I > hear a lot about how it can be slow especially when dealing with > small files. I'm starting to wonder if a straight up NFS server > with a few SSDs would be less hassle and perhaps offer better VM > performance than glusterFS can currently. > > I want to get the best oVirt performance I can get (on somewhat of a > budget) with a fairly small amount of required disk space (under > 2TB). I'm not sure if hyper-converged setup w/GlusterFS is the > answer or not. I'd like to avoid spending 15k only to find out that > it's too slow. > > > What is "too slow" for you, what are your expectations? > > Much depending on that, you will find that different goals require > different tools. Like hammering on a screw and all that :) > > /K > > -- Tony Albers Systems administrator, IT-development Royal Danish Library, Victor Albecks Vej 1, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Tel: +45 2566 2383 / +45 8946 2316 _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
