Hi Dominik and thanks for the quick reply. Purely the load balancing for LACP support and the low overhead. Since teamd is probably going to be the future I wanted to have oVirt using it. Furthermore, teamd is much more flexible to extend, add new interfaces, change priorities and you name it.
It would be great if teamd support was added in the upcoming oVirt releases. I've seen there is an RFE for the same question I asked here. Thanks On 5/13/19 9:26 PM, Dominik Holler wrote: > On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:30:11 +0200 > Valentin Bajrami <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello guys, >> >> Next week, I'm planning to deploy ovirt-node 4.3 on a few hosts. I've >> been running bonds for the past years but I'd like to know if teaming >> (teamd) is also supported with this version. >> > No, unfortunately not. > May I ask why you want to use teaming instead of bonding? > > >> My current package version(s): >> >> OS Version: | RHEL - 7 - 6.1810.2.el7.centos >> OS Description: | oVirt Node 4.3.1 >> Kernel Version: | 3.10.0 - 957.5.1.el7.x86_64 >> KVM Version: | 2.12.0 - 18.el7_6.3.1 >> LIBVIRT Version: | libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.4 >> VDSM Version: | vdsm-4.30.9-1.el7 >> SPICE Version: | 0.14.0 - 6.el7_6.1 >> GlusterFS Version: | glusterfs-5.3-2.el7 >> CEPH Version: | librbd1-10.2.5-4.el7 >> Open vSwitch Version: | openvswitch-2.10.1-3.el7 >> Kernel Features: | PTI: 1, IBRS: 0, RETP: 1 >> VNC Encryption: | Disabled >> >> Is anyone running teamd on this version ? >> >> Thanks in advance >> -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Valentin Bajrami Target Holding _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/N4OJ2SXBUMSOJ4CD2XXZJ2A3HH3VVVLF/
