Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Ovirt an HA cluster? I assume pacemaker 
would be for specific apps like httpd or database, correct? Gluster is more of 
a distributed file system. I'm just wondering with the performance complaints 
with gluster if there wouldn't be a better solution.

Just thinking out loud. 

Eric Evans
Digital Data Services LLC.
304.660.9080


-----Original Message-----
From: Uwe Laverenz <u...@laverenz.de> 
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 1:57 PM
To: users@ovirt.org
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt 4.4.0 Beta release refresh is now available 
for testing

Hi Eric,
Am 13.04.20 um 18:15 schrieb eev...@digitaldatatechs.com:
> I have a question for the developers: Why use gluster? Why not 
> Pacemaker or something with better performance stats?
> 
> Just curious.
> 
> Eric Evans

if I'm not mistaken, these two have different purposes: gluster(fs) is a 
distributed storage software and pacemaker is for resource management of HA 
cluster systems.

regards,
Uwe
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: 
https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/33JKX6SNGJZRO4D5HNTHDUBZEURLCDAX/
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/ZQ5F2ZGBE2462XLXPJMMVKKRZLMUSZIF/

Reply via email to