I don't know if you can just remove the gluster-rdma rpm. I'm using mlnx ofed on some 4.4 ovirt node hosts by installing it via the mellanox tar/iso and running the mellanox install script after adding the required dependencies with --enable-repo, which isn't the same as adding a repository and 'dnf install'. So I would try that on a test host.
I use it for the 'virtual infiniband' interfaces that get attached to VMs as 'host device passthru'. I'll note the node versions of gluster are 7.8 (node 4.4.4.0/CentOS8.3) and 7.9 (node 4.4.4.1/CentOS8.3). unlike your glusterfs version 6.0.x I'll be trying to install mellanox ofed on node 4.4.7.1 (CentOS 8 stream) soon to see how that works out. On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 10:04 PM Vinícius Ferrão via Users <users@ovirt.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a way to keep Mellanox OFED and oVirt/RHV playing nice with each > other? > > The real issue is regarding GlusterFS. It seems to be a Mellanox issue, > but I would like to know if there's something that we can do make both play > nice on the same machine: > > [root@rhvepyc2 ~]# dnf update --nobest > Updating Subscription Management repositories. > Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:25 ago on Wed 04 Aug 2021 02:01:11 AM > -03. > Dependencies resolved. > > Problem: both package mlnx-ofed-all-user-only-5.4-1.0.3.0.rhel8.4.noarch > and mlnx-ofed-all-5.4-1.0.3.0.rhel8.4.noarch obsolete glusterfs-rdma > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > glusterfs-rdma-6.0-49.1.el8.x86_64 > - package ovirt-host-4.4.7-1.el8ev.x86_64 requires glusterfs-rdma, but > none of the providers can be installed > - package mlnx-ofed-all-5.4-1.0.3.0.rhel8.4.noarch obsoletes > glusterfs-rdma provided by glusterfs-rdma-6.0-49.1.el8.x86_64 > - package glusterfs-rdma-3.12.2-40.2.el8.x86_64 requires > glusterfs(x86-64) = 3.12.2-40.2.el8, but none of the providers can be > installed > - package glusterfs-rdma-6.0-15.el8.x86_64 requires glusterfs(x86-64) = > 6.0-15.el8, but none of the providers can be installed > - package glusterfs-rdma-6.0-20.el8.x86_64 requires glusterfs(x86-64) = > 6.0-20.el8, but none of the providers can be installed > - package glusterfs-rdma-6.0-37.el8.x86_64 requires glusterfs(x86-64) = > 6.0-37.el8, but none of the providers can be installed > - package glusterfs-rdma-6.0-37.2.el8.x86_64 requires glusterfs(x86-64) > = 6.0-37.2.el8, but none of the providers can be installed > - cannot install both glusterfs-3.12.2-40.2.el8.x86_64 and > glusterfs-6.0-49.1.el8.x86_64 > - cannot install both glusterfs-6.0-15.el8.x86_64 and > glusterfs-6.0-49.1.el8.x86_64 > - cannot install both glusterfs-6.0-20.el8.x86_64 and > glusterfs-6.0-49.1.el8.x86_64 > - cannot install both glusterfs-6.0-37.el8.x86_64 and > glusterfs-6.0-49.1.el8.x86_64 > - cannot install both glusterfs-6.0-37.2.el8.x86_64 and > glusterfs-6.0-49.1.el8.x86_64 > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > ovirt-host-4.4.7-1.el8ev.x86_64 > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > glusterfs-6.0-49.1.el8.x86_64 > > ============================================================================================================================================================= > Package Architecture Version > Repository > Size > > ============================================================================================================================================================= > Installing dependencies: > openvswitch x86_64 > 2.14.1-1.54103 mlnx_ofed_5.4-1.0.3.0_base > 17 M > ovirt-openvswitch noarch 2.11-1.el8ev > rhv-4-mgmt-agent-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms > 8.7 k > replacing rhv-openvswitch.noarch 1:2.11-7.el8ev > unbound x86_64 1.7.3-15.el8 > rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms > 895 k > Skipping packages with conflicts: > (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): > glusterfs x86_64 > 3.12.2-40.2.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 558 k > glusterfs x86_64 6.0-15.el8 > rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 658 k > glusterfs x86_64 6.0-20.el8 > rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 659 k > glusterfs x86_64 6.0-37.el8 > rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 663 k > glusterfs x86_64 6.0-37.2.el8 > rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 662 k > Skipping packages with broken dependencies: > glusterfs-rdma x86_64 > 3.12.2-40.2.el8 rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 49 k > glusterfs-rdma x86_64 6.0-15.el8 > rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 46 k > glusterfs-rdma x86_64 6.0-20.el8 > rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 46 k > glusterfs-rdma x86_64 6.0-37.2.el8 > rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 48 k > glusterfs-rdma x86_64 6.0-37.el8 > rhel-8-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms > 48 k > > Transaction Summary > > ============================================================================================================================================================= > Install 3 Packages > Skip 10 Packages > > Total size: 18 M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > I really don't care for GlusterFS on this cluster, but Mellanox OFED is > much more relevant do me. > > Thank you all, > Vinícius. > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html > oVirt Code of Conduct: > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ > List Archives: > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/MGQBIBM4BCHBBMLCY2QDKAR3Q6OE5LCX/ >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/END4JK5QO4AHLXNKGBHPTTMCERIY4I45/