Hi Jeremias,

I'm sorry I have not seen your answer
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201108.mbox/%[email protected]%3E
When I have studied FOP to manage PDF just with Java PDF widget I have not
found documentation so I believed that it was not possible, but it seems
that is possible.
That's very cool. I will study that.

Many thanks!

Regards Angelo

2011/9/5 Jeremias Maerki <[email protected]>

> Angelo,
> as I explained in [1], you don't have to use XSL-FO when using Apache
> FOP. It supports alternative means to create PDFs.
>
> [1]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201108.mbox/%[email protected]%3E
>
> But of course, Apache PDFBox would profit a lot from a higher-level PDF
> production API. Any contributions are more than welcome.
>
> On 05.09.2011 10:56:20 Angelo zerr wrote:
> > Hi Jukka,
> >
> > Thank a lot for you answer. I have already implemented a docx->PDF and
> > odt->PDF converters with FOP but I decided to give up for :
> >
> > * performance reason. I have used XSLT cache, use xsl:key to compute the
> > odt/docx styles but the FOP implementation is less performant than iText
> > implementation, because :
> >   * FOP process : odt -> XSLT -> FO -> FOP
> >   * iText process : odt -> ODFDOM (Java) -> iText
> > * xslt vs Java model : with the iText process, your model is Java,
> although
> > with FOP your model is XML. I prefer develop Java instead of XSLT.
> >
> > That's why I'm searching Java PDF API like PDFBox to replace iText to
> > provides our code to Apache.
> >
> > Regards Angelo
> >
> > 2011/9/5 Jukka Zitting <[email protected]>
> >
> > > Hi Angelo,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Angelo zerr <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > I suppose that my post was not well explained as I have no answer. I
> will
> > > be
> > > > very happy to use PDFBox in our XDocReport converter (docx-> PDF and
> > > odt->
> > > > PDF) but develop converter is a big work and I can not investiaget
> time
> > > if I
> > > > have no support.
> > >
> > > There's been some interest in making it easier to use PDFBox to
> > > generate complex new PDF documents, but so far the main use cases have
> > > been simpler. You might want to look at Apache FOP
> > > (http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/) for a higher-level PDF generation
> > > tool.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Jukka Zitting
> > >
>
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>

Reply via email to