Hi option 1: some other Apache projects do have a wiki for that - maybe that can be done for PDFBOX too. option 2: we might open a ticket for discussion and add comments etc. to it. As soon as there is consensus on a topic we might open another ticket for that particular topic to track it's progress.
WDYT Maruan Sahyoun Am 02.03.2013 um 14:34 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <[email protected]>: > Am 27.02.2013 18:41, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> what about setting up some kind of ideas page for PDFBOX 2.0 where we could >> put together potential > > improvements e.g. new parser (if still needed), layered lib (core, apps) …. > > We could also move parts > > into a sandbox to work on it but to keep it separate from working code. > Good idea, but we have to find a suitable place for that "idea page". > >> I will have some time again to work on core parts. > Good to hear that! > >> BR >> >> Maruan Sahyoun >> >> >> Am 27.02.2013 um 18:23 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 01.02.2013 13:11, schrieb Thomas Chojecki: >>>> Hallo, >>>> the actual size of the pdfbox is nearly 3.8 MB. >>>> 2.8 MB of the filesize are "waste" with fonts and additional resources for >>>> fonts. >>>> >>>> Is it possibile to move that 2.8 MB of resources to the fontbox? For my >>>> purpose >>> I'm afraid it isn't, those are not part of Fontbox but of PDFBox. >>> >>>> of signing and verifying documents I don't need the fontbox and that >>>> resources. >>>> The only two resources that are needed for parsing a document are the >>>> glyphlist.txt and additional_glyphlist.txt >>>> >>>> So the pdfbox will shrink to a size of about 1 MB. >>> We already started a discussion on splitting PDFBox up into smaller parts to >>> minimize the footprint for different scenarios, see [1]. Unfortunately no >>> one >>> found some cycles to push it further. >>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Thomas >>> >>> >>> BR >>> Andreas Lehmkühler >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-586 > > BR > Andreas Lehmkühler >
