Most of the time, the 2.0 version is very stable. There's currently a
lot going on but I hope that all the regressions will be solved in a few
days.
Tilman
Am 26.02.2014 06:55, schrieb Tres Finocchiaro:
@Tilman,
Thank you for the record-breaking fast response!
qz-print can certainly migrate to JDK6 if needed.
The project only use the silent print feature (no bouncycastle, no advanced
logging). Would I be a good usecase for 2.0.0 or should I hold off for a
milestone release?
- [email protected]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]>wrote:
Yes this is a known problem. PDFBOX 2.0 has a much improved font
rendering. But that one needs JDK 6 :-(
Tilman
Am 26.02.2014 06:41, schrieb Tres Finocchiaro:
Hi, I'm the author of qz-print and for our next release, we're switching
from pdf-renderer to pdf-box.
Things are working pretty well in terms of integration, however I've
noticed that fonts seem to render a bit off on some platforms.
After investigating this, I decided to make the output a bit more verbose
and go this:
INFO: Couldn't load VYQQAT+Arial, using font Arial instead
INFO: Couldn't load QTPJOZ+TimesNewRoman, using font Times New Roman
instead
From my research the ABCDEF+Font names are embedded fonts, which from my
little experience reading the PDFBOX source code there is some form of
support for embedded fonts.
Reactively, I've created some improved font mapping for Ubuntu (
http://jsfiddle.net/LpBLw/) but I have to ask, am I doing something wrong
that is preventing embedded fonts from loading?
FYI - I compile my program using JDK5.
Here's the source tree I'm working from:
https://github.com/qzindustries/qz-print/tree/master/pdfbox_1.8.4_qz
Any help is greatly appreciated and thank you for the excellent work!
-Tres
- [email protected]
