In 1.8, for Standard 14 fonts (yours is) it uses the bounding box of each glyph. In a string, it uses a maximum which it keeps for the string, that results in the weird effect that the "d" is slightly higher. If the string is changed so that another glyph is appended, the larger height is kept.

In 2.0 (and in 1.8 for non standard 14 fonts), it uses 1/2 of the bounding box from the font descriptor. The not-halved bounding box is usually too high.

Anyway, the 1.8 logic would work for you for standard 14 fonts, but not for all other fonts.

So there is no bug in 1.8 not in 2.0.

Tilman

Am 03.03.2016 um 19:05 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
Am 03.03.2016 um 09:11 schrieb Peter Prusinowski:
Okay, I am trying to replace some words in documents and use text.height to "delete" these words. Here is an example document : http://workupload.com/file/G8ipDe8j

The getHeightDir() is not the best strategy, for the reason I mentioned yesterday. In your case, you should call getPath() on the glyphs and get the bounding box. Or just get the font bounding box (there's a method) height, however that one is often too high, so there's a risk that you blank the line above.

But thanks for the file, I'll try to find out why it is different. The heights in 1.8 are surprising, usually they are never so "perfect" (as I said yesterday). And for some reason, in 1.8 the height of the last glyph is slightly different although it is all in one string.

1.8:
String[100.0,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=10.108002]H String[110.108,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=7.784004]e String[117.892006,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=3.8919983]l String[121.784004,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=3.8919983]l String[125.676,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=8.553993]o String[134.23,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=3.8919983] String[138.122,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=13.216003]W String[151.338,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=8.554001]o String[159.892,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=5.445999]r String[165.338,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=10.052001 space=3.8920004 width=3.8919983]l String[169.23,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 *height=10.248001* space=3.8920004 width=8.554001]d <========= ???

2.0:
String[100.0,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=10.108002]H String[110.108,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=7.7839966]e String[117.892,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=3.8919983]l String[121.784,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=3.8919983]l String[125.675995,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=8.554001]o String[134.23,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=3.8919983] String[138.122,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=13.216003]W String[151.338,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=8.554001]o String[159.892,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=5.445999]r String[165.338,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=3.8919983]l String[169.23,92.0 fs=14.0 xscale=14.0 height=8.33 space=3.8920004 width=8.554001]d



Tilman


Peter

Am 02.03.2016 um 19:24 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
Am 02.03.2016 um 14:48 schrieb Peter Prusinowski:
Hello,

I have noticed that the PrintTextLocations example in 1.8 and 2.0 gives different results for text.getHeightDir(). In 1.8 the value seems to be right, but in 2.0 it is too small. I tried with some PDFBox created documents. Is this a bug ?

Maybe, maybe not. The height is a heuristic value to help with text extraction, which is sometimes computed differently in 2.0, and it is usually about the height of an "a". Please upload the PDF.

Tilman

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org

Reply via email to