Yes, that's the case but I guess no one on the other side (FOP) is going
to update the code to support PDFBox 2.0. In my case, I depend on the
latest PDFBox version.
Ivan
On 10/5/2016 4:12 p. m., John Hewson wrote:
Ah, so the pdf-transcoder jar of Batik depends upon FOP, which in turn depends
upon FontBox. But Maven should handle that for you. Perhaps the issue is that
your own code depends upon PDFBox 2.0 while Batik (via FOP) depends upon PDFBox
1.8?
— John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
