Hi Tilman, Thanks for your response first.
I upgraded PDFBox from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2. And I tested again using the code I sent in the last email. And here are the steps. 1. Run my code with PDFBox 2.0.2 using the provided pdf file. 2. [Expected result] The schema like: ?__^?k_?7 PDTextbox 3. [What I got] firstName PDTextField Above result is a part. 'firstName'is one field name of the acroform and 'PDTextfield'is the type of the corresponding form component. And what I really concern is that without decrypting the encrypted pdf file, can I get correct schema name? I have shared the pdf file. (password for this file is abcd) Please visit this link: https://drive.google.com/a/tibco.com/file/d/0B2RK53mIzwataGxRVnMtem81cUE/vie w?usp=sharing On 2016-07-02 01:45 (+0800), Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Barry,> > > - we're already at 2.0.2, so don't bother with 2.0.1 :-)> > - please upload your PDF file to a public place (e.g. dropbox, google > > drive, or a sharehoster), because attachments are blocked here> > - you mention "If I use PDFBox 2.0.1, then I will get the right name of > > the form fields" - this sounds like all is ok in 2.0.1, isn't it? Maybe > > this is a misunderstanding - please tell us what you get with the > > different versions, and explain what you expected.> > > (The ideal bug report includes 1) what you did, 2) what you expected, 3) > > what you got instead)> > > Tilman> > > > Am 01.07.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Barry Zhao [Zhao]:> > > Hello team,> > >> > > I found a weird thing when upgrading pdfbox from 1.8.7 to 2.0.1.> > >> > > Here is my scenario below.> > >> > > I used a pdf template which was encrypted. And my code is like below.> > >> > > /import java.io.File;/> > > /import java.io.IOException;/> > > /import java.util.List;/> > > /import javax.xml.parsers.ParserConfigurationException;/> > > /import org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.PDDocument;/> > > /im
