Am 20.04.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Gabriel Pessoa:
Thank you very much for you reply, Tilman.

There is any estimative to when that new parser will be available? I ask because if that would still take some time, I think my company will want me to try make that basic parser I mentioned as first suggestion in a local fork of PDFBox until we have a official release.

I don't know. We all work on our free time, so nobody has time targets.

Tilman



Em 20/04/2017 14:25, Tilman Hausherr escreveu:
Am 20.04.2017 um 15:01 schrieb Gabriel Pessoa:
Hello.

Recently at our company we started to worry about how much memory was being used during our PDF signing process. We are using the 1.8.13 now, mostly because the loading time on 2.0.x got longer (I actually asked about it some six months ago and Tilman explained the reason why).

This question on StackOverflow I think cleared some doubts I had about how PDFBox worked: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22340674/performance-itext-vs-pdfbox

The main point being: PDFBox parses and have ALL the objects in the PDF loaded. So, complex objects will use a lot of memory. Am I correct?

Yes


If that is the case, I understand that is necessary for PDF manipulation, but is that necessary for PDF signing? Looking at a signed PDF structure it looks like only the Root entry (to update the AcroForm entry) and the signed page entry (to update the Annots entry) are really needed for signing.

And the acroform field tree


So I would be too wrong in suggesting a new load method that would be used only for singing and that would only load those necessary entries and would not load things like images and fonts and tables, etc.

If not that, something akin to "lazy loading" could be done? With the PDF objects only being actually parsed and loaded when being accessed. The load would only map all the references in that case.

If any on those two options is possible but you don't have anyone currently available to work on it, I could try to develop that solution. I would only need to know if it would be better to use the 2.0.6 branch or the 3.0.0 trunk.

Thank you very much for your time.


Andreas wrote that he's working on an on-demand parser.

Tilman


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to