Guten Tag Tilman Hausherr, am Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 um 20:12 schrieben Sie:
> Well you could also have entered it without parameters and get the usage. Simply didn't think of that when I had the docs in front of me. :-) >> BTW 2, it seems to me that the command line app is printing using >> Scaling.ACTUAL_SIZE while in your bug SHRINK_TO_SIZE is preferred. [...] > Sorry I don't understand. There's the following sentence in one of the comments in your provided bug report: > ACTUAL_SIZE usually clips unless you have a printer that has a > printable area equal to the full page size of the PDF (i.e. to print > A4 you'll need an A4+ printer). So yes, SHRINK_TO_SIZE is usually > what you want. So I would have expected that printing at the command line would to default to SHRINK_TO_SIZE as well. But looking at the code I have the feeling that this is not the case. Just wanted to mention it, might not be a problem and my print results are perfectly fine, not missing any content or such. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail: [email protected] AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
