I was asking this actually, we shouldn’t be needing more space. But we get “not enough space” exception when we give the signed pdf path as inFile parameter.
On 5 Jul 2020 Sun at 06:59 Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I have no idea why one would need "more space" for the signature area > when signing a signed document. > > Tilman > > Am 04.07.2020 um 21:38 schrieb Okan Konur: > > Hi, > > > > When we sign with our custom pki api, certificates and a smartcard > instead > > of keytool generated pfx, we needed to increase signature size as > follows, > > otherwise there was "not enough space" error. > > > > > signatureOptions.setPreferredSignatureSize(SignatureOptions.DEFAULT_SIGNATURE_SIZE > > * 12) > > > > This works fine. However, the problem is when signing an already signed > > pdf. > > Consecutive signing operations need more space naturally, but my > > understanding was the signature size should be the same because this is > an > > incremental update. > > (We are not trying to concatenate to the previous signature dictionary.) > > > > So do we need to increase the signature size multiplier for every other > > signature operation on the same document? > > > > Kind regards, > > Okan > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > >
