Will you accept my code changes to have different maxedge values for 32 bit
vs 64 bit?


On Mon, Nov 8, 2021, 12:51 AM Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> wrote:

> Am 08.11.2021 um 06:38 schrieb Kevin Day:
> > I just realized what MAXEDGE does.
> >
> > You are basically saying that the raster can't be bigger than MAXEDGE x
> > MAXEDGE, and if it is, then you clamp the dimensions.
> >
> > But - are you scaling the bitmap?  Or are you just cropping it?  If you
> are
> > just cropping it, it seems like a better approach would be to adjust the
> > tiling matrix by the amount of the scaling required to prevent the raster
> > from being too big.
>
> It crops. It is of course sometimes a terrible solution. I did try
> scaling but wasn't successful but maybe you will.
>
> Tilman
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > I just committed more changes to my fork:
> >
> > 1.  Refined MAXEDGE clamping to scale both dimensions instead of clamping
> > the long dimension (I think this is a better way to do this - but it
> feels
> > like we should also be scaling the tiling matrix - see above)
> > 2.  Added default MAXEDGE values that depend on the bitness of the JVM.
> I
> > found that MAXEDGE = 500 worked on 32 bit JVMs (but 650 does *not* work).
> > So setting MAXEDGE to 500 for 32 bit JVMs and 3000 for 64 bit JVMs seems
> > like a pretty decent compromise.
> >
> >
> > I look forward to your thoughts about whether MAXEDGE should produce
> > scaling of the tilematrix (or some other matrix).  Hopefully that will be
> > an easy thing for you to comment on.
> >
> > - K
> >
> > Kevin Day
> >
> > *trumpet**p| *480.961.6003 x1002
> > *e| *ke...@trumpetinc.com
> > www.trumpetinc.com <http://trumpetinc.com/>
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/trumpet-inc.>| Trumpet Blog
> > <http://trumpetinc.com/blog/>| Twitter  <https://twitter.com/trumpetinc>
> >
> > Proud to be Great Place To Work
> > <https://www.greatplacetowork.com/certified-company/7012667> certified
> > since 2019
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 10:03 PM Kevin Day <ke...@trumpetinc.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Test procedure:
> >>
> >> Open PdfBox Debugger, load PDF, capture render time from label in lower
> >> left corner of window.
> >>
> >>
> >> With PdfBox 2.0.17 - this PDF renders in about 4.8 seconds (but is
> missing
> >> the colored pattern).
> >>
> >> With PdfBox 3 baseline (no code changes) - this PDF renders in 16.2
> >> seconds seconds.
> >>
> >> With PdfBox 3 caching changes only (no BigBufferedImage) - this PDF
> >> renders in 14.7 seconds
> >>
> >>
> >> So I have not done any damage, and I've sped it up a little bit.
> >>
> >>
> >> But that's only with a single render.  Because printing can involve
> >> rendering many times for banded printing (on my test device, I am seeing
> >> well over 100 bands when printing this sample file), the page level
> caching
> >> should be substantial (the rendering on your test PDF is so slow that it
> >> almost can't be printed) - it is certainly a huge improvement for my
> test
> >> document.
> >>
> >>
> >> So I think my improvements to the caching (both the tile cache and
> adding
> >> caching at the page level) are valid.
> >>
> >> - K
> >>
> >> Kevin Day
> >>
> >> *trumpet**p| *480.961.6003 x1002
> >> *e| *ke...@trumpetinc.com
> >> www.trumpetinc.com <http://trumpetinc.com/>
> >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/trumpet-inc.>| Trumpet Blog
> >> <http://trumpetinc.com/blog/>| Twitter  <https://twitter.com/trumpetinc
> >
> >>
> >> Proud to be Great Place To Work
> >> <https://www.greatplacetowork.com/certified-company/7012667> certified
> >> since 2019
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 8:34 PM Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I don't have much time right now, but please test your change with the
> >>> file from
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3688
> >>>
> >>> Tilman
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to