Great, thank you! We’ll look forward to seeing this in the next release! --Dan
From: Andreas Lehmkühler <andr...@lehmi.de.INVALID> Date: Sunday, December 3, 2023 at 1:58 PM To: users@pdfbox.apache.org <users@pdfbox.apache.org> Subject: [External Sender] Re: PDFBox 3.0.1 compile dependency on junit-jupiter solved, see [1] for further details. Andreas [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5722__;!!Iz9xO38YGHZK!86ddyxmB45umUPT5RruBNFFOHrj4DuhHNvfFoJ0V1eQuJhQo9dtUS41wP9sKfM2mKCyhfjyTwkVcb52L0AYxMorg$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5722__;!!Iz9xO38YGHZK!86ddyxmB45umUPT5RruBNFFOHrj4DuhHNvfFoJ0V1eQuJhQo9dtUS41wP9sKfM2mKCyhfjyTwkVcb52L0AYxMorg$> Am 02.12.23 um 09:05 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler: > Hi, > > Am 01.12.23 um 17:14 schrieb Dan Rabe: >> It looks like a compile dependency on junit-jupiter snuck into the >> 3.0.1 release. >> >> If I look at the maven page for 3.0.0 at >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.pdfbox/pdfbox/3.0.0__;!!Iz9xO38YGHZK!86ddyxmB45umUPT5RruBNFFOHrj4DuhHNvfFoJ0V1eQuJhQo9dtUS41wP9sKfM2mKCyhfjyTwkVcb52L0IYlyu3Q$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.pdfbox/pdfbox/3.0.0__;!!Iz9xO38YGHZK!86ddyxmB45umUPT5RruBNFFOHrj4DuhHNvfFoJ0V1eQuJhQo9dtUS41wP9sKfM2mKCyhfjyTwkVcb52L0IYlyu3Q$> >> , >> junit-jupiter is listed as a test dependency. >> If I look at the maven page for 3.0.1 at >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.pdfbox/pdfbox/3.0.1__;!!Iz9xO38YGHZK!86ddyxmB45umUPT5RruBNFFOHrj4DuhHNvfFoJ0V1eQuJhQo9dtUS41wP9sKfM2mKCyhfjyTwkVcb52L0Bp0SxKX$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.pdfbox/pdfbox/3.0.1__;!!Iz9xO38YGHZK!86ddyxmB45umUPT5RruBNFFOHrj4DuhHNvfFoJ0V1eQuJhQo9dtUS41wP9sKfM2mKCyhfjyTwkVcb52L0Bp0SxKX$> >> , >> junit-jupiter is listed as a compile dependency. >> >> As a result, the war file that I build would contain the junit >> libraries. I’m assuming it’s a mistake of some sort that it got >> reclassified as “compile” rather than “test”? > Your assumption is correct, it's a mistake. It was introduce with > PDFBOX-5699 which rearranged some parts of the maven build. My bad :-( > > I'm going to fix that and doublecheck all the other components. > > Thanks for the report > > Andreas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
