Chris - I don't think it is appropriate to promote a vendor image here from
a vendor perspective.

A better approach is to point out the change has been cherry-picked to
branch-2.6 and an ongoing discussion for getting a new bugfix release for
branch 2.6. is out.

- Sijie

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 12:15 PM Chris Bartholomew <
chris.bartholo...@kesque.com> wrote:

> For folks on Pulsar 2.6 using token-based authentication, since there is no
> 2.6 version with the CVE fix yet available, you are welcome to use our
> Pulsar Docker images which contain the fix and which we have confirmed
> resolves the CVE:
>
>
>    -
>
>    datastax/pulsar:2.6.2_1.0.1
>    <
> https://hub.docker.com/layers/datastax/pulsar/2.6.2_1.0.1/images/sha256-598c4a99f4716de43838657b741b92f0310cea8539b9538659d4657ef8aaee17?context=explore
> >
>    -
>
>    datastax/pulsar-all:2.6.2_1.0.1
>    <
> https://hub.docker.com/layers/datastax/pulsar-all/2.6.2_1.0.1/images/sha256-dfb4fa500372c17e009427322fd84a6302d7a4bf716cd511c103449756bad79f?context=explore
> >
>
>
> The fix
> <
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/67e7e0cd23157ebbc8c18f40ce0eb87f600dafb6
> >
> has been committed to branch-2.6 (by Enrico). We (DataStax) are looking to
> help get an official 2.6 release out for this vulnerability fix ASAP.
>
> Chris
>
>
> On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 09:27, PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > CVE-2021-22160 Apache Pulsar Information Disclosure
> >
> > Severity: High
> >
> > Versions Affected:
> > Apache Pulsar < 2.7.1
> >
> > Description:
> > If Apache Pulsar is configured to authenticate clients using tokens
> > based on JSON Web Tokens (JWT), the signature of the token is not
> > validated if the algorithm of the presented token is set to "none".
> > This allows an attacker to connect to Pulsar instances as any user
> > (incl. admins).
> >
> > Mitigation:
> > Users of the affected versions should apply one of the following
> > mitigations:
> > Upgrade to Apache Pulsar 2.7.1 or later
> >
> > Credit:
> > This issue was identified by Peter Stöckli
> >
>

Reply via email to