sure that sounds interesting. Adam
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Carl Trieloff <[email protected]> wrote: > > Adam, > > there is now also an option to atomically update a direct binding. This > means that you can > move where the messages are being routed without fear. > > This would also be a very simple way to do this use case. > > if you want to try that I can give it a try I send an example on how to > > Carl. > > > > Adam Chase wrote: >> >> Any luck on this headers exchange wiki page? I'd be content with just >> a basic outline. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Adam >> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Robert Greig <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> 2009/1/7 Carl Trieloff <[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> We do support the headers exchange, so that can be used. Maybe the best >>>> thing is to >>>> doc the pattern on a wiki page using headers exchange for Adam. Are you >>>> able >>>> to do that? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, I'll take a look at writing that up over the next few days. I >>> think it will work, although it is more complex than the selector >>> case. >>> >>> RG >>> >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
