Hi, I'm new to Qpid and have been following the threads and reading up on the docs for some time. I'm trying to decide on the brokers to be used for a private project and have this doubt.
Why are multiple brokers that bring with them additional compatibility requirements being developed by QPID ? Is it for enhancing the reach to other platforms that only a particular technology might support (JMS etc) or is this a corporate missive from Redhat or some one else? Where can i find the information regarding ways in which the brokers differ from one another ? Regards Arun -----Original Message----- From: Marnie McCormack [mailto: ] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 2:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: qpid broker on windows See what you mean, thanks. The Qpid roadmap shows 0-10 implementation on the Java broker as one of our next big ticket deliveries. This would mean that the C++ client could again interop with the Java broker. On the C# front, we are discussing on the dev list the strategic solution going forward, but again 0-10 implementation on the Java broker will put the choice of .Net client in the user's hands. Appreciate this doesn't help now, but just for info ! Regards, Marnie On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:41 AM, falconair <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some components of my system need to interact with the broker through > C# (and soon C++). That is the main motivation behind using qpid, > rather than other jms providers. > > > Marnie McCormack wrote: > > > > The Java broker works with the M4 Java Client and the M4 0-8 .Net client. > > It > > does not yet support 0-10 features, but if you're using JMS that's > > probably > > not a major issue. > > > > Marnie > > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Carl Trieloff > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> > >> you are correct, the Java broker is not up to 0-10 yet. > >> Carl. > >> > >> > >> > >> falconair wrote: > >> > >>> I stopped using the Java broker months ago because the latest clients > >>> (java, > >>> .NET) are based on version 0-10 protocol and the only broker which > >>> supports > >>> this version is c++. Am I wrong in my assumption? If Java broker > works > >>> with m4 clients, I'm happy to switch to java for dev/test work. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Marnie McCormack wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I thought it'd be useful to point out that the Qpid Java Broker comes > >>>> complete with a Windows startup .bat and is widely used by developers > >>>> on > >>>> Windows, out of the box so to speak. It is production proven. > >>>> You can find out what you need to get started with the Java Broker at: > >>>> http://qpid.apache.org/getting-started-guide.html > >>>> > >>>> Please give us a shout if you need any extra info. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Marnie > >>>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Carl Trieloff > >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> falconair wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Another poster asked for a pre-built windows binary of qpid broker. > >>>>>> I'd > >>>>>> like > >>>>>> to encourage the devs to provide it as well. > >>>>>> Since qpid is still not very well known, I suspect it is the > >>>>>> down-in-the-trenches developers who are introducing qpid to their > >>>>>> companies. Almost every place I have worked, developer workstations > >>>>>> are > >>>>>> windows based. In other words, devs are unlikely to experiment with > >>>>>> qpid > >>>>>> if > >>>>>> they have to > >>>>>> track down a fairly large number of dependencies and compile from > >>>>>> source. > >>>>>> The problem is worse in distributed environments where one dev > either > >>>>>> has to > >>>>>> distributed his own qpid exe or convince other devs to build it from > >>>>>> scratch. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think this problem will be mitigated by amqp 0-10 java broker, but > >>>>>> until > >>>>>> then, pre-built binaries will be very useful. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> yes, we have started a thread on the dev list to this end, and a > >>>>> version > >>>>> has been built for Windows. Once > >>>>> a few people have validated it, we can post it to the user list. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you want to help validate the build, jump on the dev list. > >>>>> > >>>>> Carl. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > >>>>> Project: http://qpid.apache.org > >>>>> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/qpid-broker-on-windows-tp2207029p2237421.html > Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > > Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.13/1912 - Release Date: 1/23/2009 6:54 PM
