Have you given the Qpid Active-Active cluster a spin yet? did you know
we had one..
i.e. we can do full Active Active clustering out the box with the C++
broker. it add about .35ms round trip
latency on latencytest to keep a 4 node A-A cluster fully in sync
Carl.
Andrew Wright wrote:
Yes, that's right. We're looking at in-memory replicated clustering
technologies (eg. Terracotta/Coherence etc) in an active-active style
setup.
Cheers,
Andrew
On 28 Jan 2009, at 23:44, Robert Greig wrote:
2009/1/22 Andrew Wright <[email protected]>:
Background: we're examining ways to get reliable app-level node
failover
without losing messages. Best thing we've got so far is durable JMS
topic
subscriptions, and a backup app node taking over a client id if the
primary
node fails. But this atomic-swap of direct bindings could be useful
alternative/addition. We're looking at a java based client, with a c++
broker.
I take it you are trying to do this without veritas or MSCS or similar?
RG
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
