I would certainly agree that currently we have more experience with the BDB based store - it also (last time I checked it) gave much better performance also... so for those two reasons I would currently recommend it over the Derby store in production use. The Derby store is probably easier to query directly and to have a look at the data inside however.
-- Rob 2009/10/14 Marnie McCormack <[email protected]> > My view is that we recommend BDB, simply because we know that it performs > under heavy load. I'm not sure what kind of > robustness/performance/reliability tests have been run on Derby - anyone ? > > Marnie > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Robert Greig <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > 2009/10/13 Martin Ritchie <[email protected]>: > > > > > There is some detail in our FAQ but I've updated our lt to include > > > links to the Derby Message Store for providing Apache Licensed > > > persistence and is bundled with the recent releases. The only cavet is > > > that it has not had as much reported testing. > > > > Just to clear for our users - are we recommending the Derby store or > > the BDB store for production use? > > > > RG > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > > > > >
