On 06/09/2011 01:50 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 06/09/2011 01:44 PM, Fallon, Richard wrote:
Hi Gordon,
Thanks for taking the time to look at this.
Rather unfortunately our whole design has been centered around the use
of dynamic routes and the header exchange, however at this stage 'any'
is better than 'none'! And at least I know I'm not going insane!
So, I've never been in this position before where I am
interested/relying on a fix. What are the usual kind of timescales for
such a fix?
I've pasted in a suggested fix to the JIRA[1]. It passes all existing
tests and seems to fix my test case. However I'd like to get a bit more
review from those more familiar with the code before committing.
Once committed it would then be part of the next release, which is 0.12
targeted for the end of July. You could of course apply the patch to the
0.10 release yourself before that.
FYI: fix (and new test) committed as r1133942.
--Gordon.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3298
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
