Hi Gordon,
I've got headers bindings on the destination broker with a binding key set
to "data1"
I did "qpid-route route add localhost:5673 localhost:5672 amq.match data1"
Which seems to be what you were suggesting to Richard and I get the
following message on the source broker "error Execution exception:
internal-error: Invalid or missing x-match value binding to headers
exchange. Must be a string ["all" or "any"]
(qpid/broker/HeadersExchange.cpp:110)"
Were you suggesting that static exchange routes should work with headers
exchange if one creates the binding on the dest broker with a binding key
and one passes that to qpid-route.
If you've tried this and it works then it could have been finger trouble on
my part but I "think" I've set up everything properly.
As a (slight) aside. I've only just started playing with federated routes in
anger (too much playing with QMF :-) and I'm curious about what sort of
management tools are available. Clearly there's qpid-route but I'm likely to
be creating a very large topology and diagnosing problems with that from a
console is likely to be error prone are you aware of anything that might be
useful to manage very large distributed topologies?
Cheers
Frase
Gordon Sim wrote:
>
>
> What I would suggest is adding a unique key the addresses of your
> subscribers to e.g.:
>
> x-bindings:[{exchange:'amq.match', key:'lookup+xml', arguments :
> {x-match:all, data-service:lookup, data-type:xml}}
>
> That should work around the latest issue.
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-qpid-users.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Syntax-For-Creating-Static-Route-with-Headers-Exchange-tp6583752p6587285.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
