Which broker are you using? I'm assuming the Java broker based on Derby question
The C++ broker with the msg store has been bench-marked at lot is a great performer for most use cases. There are a few use-cases we are still working on. I can point you to some info setup if you would like Carl. On 08/22/2011 02:47 PM, Rishi Dev wrote: > Hi, > > I was doing some QPID performance tests. I had it's msg store set to Derby > and then pumped 25000 large msgs (XML format) each msg of size about 2.9 MB. > It took on an average 497 mili seconds per msg. Compared to this RabbitMQ > has shown a performance of ~88 mili seconds per msg to push it into the > queue. RabbitMQ has been a lot better performer. > > Do you think that QPID performance will improve if I use BDB or something > else as msg store instead of DERBY? > > Also, are there MsgStore implementations for plain Disk storage and Oracle > Database storage? > I understand for many thread/articles that I can write one by myself but I > am curious if something is already out there to save some effort for me. > > Thanks, > Rishi > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:users-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
