On 23 January 2012 15:39, Alan Conway <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/21/2012 03:15 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: > >> So... don't get your hopes up too high... but I am going to look at >> utilising BDB's HA capabilities to implement some sort of Active-Passive >> HA >> solution... it looks like it shouldn't be *too* much work at first glance >> (non master nodes block on startup waiting to be elected master, and then >> configure themselves from the now-master BDB instance). >> >> At best this is going to be a bit of a hobby project for me as it's not >> something that is strictly necessary for my personal end users, >> >> Cheers, >> Rob >> >> > FYI: the new HA design for the C++ cluster is much more amenable to being > implemented in Java. It doesn't depend on corosync and uses only AMQP for > communication among members. I'll be posting an updated design doc later > today, will ping the list. >
Yes - sorry - I meant to say something about that. I'm very keen to try to get that working between brokers once we've had a chance to digest/discuss the ideas. Definitely on my plans as well - but probably a little more work than the simple BDB HA solution, Cheers, Rob
