Hi Hamid, I understand the advantages of the file based certificates. But: a) right now I have no idea whether the SChannel API is able to work with them b) I believe the use of the Windows built in certificate is also in the other parts of the Windows version (the broker, also client is already searching for the public key of the broker there etc.) ... so storing the client's private key there as well is much more consistent behaviour (and c) I'm glad I managed get it working at least like this :-o)
I can take a quick look at it, but do not put too much hope on it ... Regards Jakub On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 17:36, Hamid.Shahid <hamid2...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thats awsome... > > It would be ideal case if we can have support for file based certificates as > well. > > thanks Jakub! > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/SSL-Client-Authentication-support-for-C-on-Windows-tp7350387p7352312.html > Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
