Late to the thread -- why not use cqpid swig lib to erlang?



On 05/25/2012 03:51 AM, Zhemzhitsky Sergey wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Introduction of new java brokers just to bridge erlang or any other clients 
> is like to shoot sparrows with a cannon to my mind. It's a pity that amqp 
> protocol versions are not interoperable. 
> Fortunately programming languages provide different ways to make calls to a 
> native code.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Sergey
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ilyushonak Barys [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 11:32 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Erlang client for Qpid C++ Broker
>
> Hi, Frase
>
> Thank you very much for the explanation.
> The one more thing we can do is to move our clients to rabbitmq directly. 
> As far as we use camel a lot, it looks much easier than adopt qpid java to 
> rabbitmq client.
>
> But. The way we would like to achieve - is to keep qpid c++ performance. So, 
> we are going to investigate it.
>
> Regards,
> Boris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fraser Adams [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 11:20 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Erlang client for Qpid C++ Broker
>
> Hi Guys,
> I think that's a fair point, though to be fair the approach Alex suggested is 
> really just an instance of a message bridge, which is a standard Integration 
> Pattern. It's clearly not ideal but ultimately you have an integration 
> problem to solve. We've had similar scenarios bridging between qpid and 
> ActiveMQ - in our case we used Apache Camel as it has a qpid endpoint and 
> integrates well with ActiveMQ, but ultimately the issues are pretty similar 
> to yours.
>
> Also in many topologies it's pretty common to federate brokers - I guess it 
> depends on your architecture but a fairly common pattern in a geographically 
> distributed system would be for clients to publish to a local broker and for 
> that broker to be federated to other locations, it might be slightly 
> counterintuitive but in that sort of scenario you are likely to improve 
> reliability of the overall system and certainly improve things from the 
> perspective of the publishing client. Clearly if your architecture comprised 
> a single C++ broker with clients publishing/consuming directly to it then 
> there's a potential reduction in reliability due to probabilities (MTBF) 
> being multiplicative on components connected in series.
>
> One option (though adds a little more complexity) would be to to stand up a 
> couple of parallel instances of the Java broker and load balance between 
> them, that's useful from a scaling perspective if you have "peaky" 
> performance characteristics but more usefully if one falls over the other 
> carries on.
>
> Sorry that I can't be of more practical help, but hopefully I can reassure 
> you that the sort of problems/choices/compromises you're having to make are 
> pretty common sometimes it's a case of gritting teeth and doing what's "least 
> worst" as opposed to elegant - that'll be the difference between engineering 
> and theory :-)
>
> I expect most of us are going to be faced with "comedy" integration problems 
> when AMQP 1.0 starts to roll out. I *really hope* hint hint!!! 
> that the qpid brokers for AMQP 1.0 are going to be bilingual 0.10/1.0 or I'm 
> going to have some fun....
>
> Good luck
> Frase
>
>
> On 25/05/12 07:47, Zhemzhitsky Sergey wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Thanks a lot, but this sounds pretty horrible, I suppose.
>> Introducing new java brokers just to forward  messages to c++ broker 
>> increases complexity of the overall system and decreases its reliability.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Sergey
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Oleksandr Rudyy [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:28 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Erlang client for Qpid C++ Broker
>>
>> Hi Sergey,
>>
>> You cannot use 0.9.1 amqp client with broker supporting only 0.10 amqp 
>> protocol.
>>
>> Java Qpid Broker supports both 0.10 and 0.9.1 protocols.
>>
>> You can publish messages with Erling client into Qpid Java Broker (or 
>> RabitMQ broker) and use Qpid java client to consume messages from that 
>> broker and publish them into c++ Qpid broker.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Alex Rudyy
>>
>> On 24 May 2012 16:18, Zhemzhitsky Sergey<[email protected]>  
>> wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I have to use qpid c++ broker 0.12 from erlang.
>>> Are there any erlang clients that can be used to connect to the qpid c++ 
>>> broker, except for rabbitmq client?
>>> If there isn’t, have anybody succeeded in connecting rabbitmq erlang client 
>>> that supports amqp 0.9.1 to the qpidd c++ broker that supports amqp 0.10 
>>> only?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Sergey
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>
>>> The information contained in this message may be privileged and conf 
>>> idential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the original 
>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, 
>>> retransmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in 
>>> reliance upon, this information is prohibited. If you have received this 
>>> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to 
>>> this message and delete it from your computer. Thank you for your 
>>> cooperation. Troika Dialog, Russia.
>>> If you need assistance please contact our Contact Center  (+7495) 258
>>> 0500 or go to www.troika.ru/eng/Contacts/system.wbp
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For 
>> additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For 
>> additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional 
> commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> B KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB  
> [  X  ܚX KK[XZ[
>  \ \  ][  X  ܚX P\Y
>  \X K ܙ B  ܈Y][ۘ[  [X[  K[XZ[
>  \ \  Z[\Y
>  \X K ܙ B B
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to