On 07/23/2012 07:40 AM, Jakub Scholz wrote: > Yes, the use of flow-to-disk queues unfortunately doesn't solve the > memory issue on 100%. It just decreases the memory consumption, so the > point when the broker runs out of memory is postponed a bit. > >
we actually need 'real' flow to disk queue here. Would a queue type that does not allow browsing for example, but flushes everything to disk and only supports FIFO cover your use case. Issue is when you flush everything to disk, any non FIFO operation becomes very expensive Carl. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
