Seems I got that.. i have to do the proper config under in
virtualhosts.xml, <store> element

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Sajith Kariyawasam <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I tried making the queue persistent, I created using  node:{durable:
> True}} option, it gets created, and I could seen in Management console as
> well that the queue (sajith_queue_test)
> is durable, and other two default queues are not durable. (refer the
> attached screen shot)
>
> And when I restart the broker I could only see the default two queues,
> "ping" and "queue", even though those are durable-false, and my newly
> created durable queue is gone.. ?
>
> I saw, Qpid java broker has enabled persistence via Derby DB. Do I have to
> enable Derby DB related settings?
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Sajith Kariyawasam <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Rob Godfrey <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 September 2012 10:57, Sajith Kariyawasam <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Rob Godfrey <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On 5 September 2012 10:20, Sajith Kariyawasam <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Thanks Gordon,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I was able to create a Dynamic queue ..
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Then I was trying to write a message consumer to consume messages
>>> from
>>> > > that
>>> > > > particular queue dynamically created. For the time being I tried
>>> both
>>> > the
>>> > > > publisher code as well as the consumer code in Java,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Here are my code samples..
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Sender.java
>>> > > > -----------------
>>> > > >                         Connection connection = new
>>> > > > AMQConnection("amqp://guest:guest@test
>>> > > > /?brokerlist='tcp://localhost:5672'");
>>> > > > Session session = connection.createSession(false,
>>> > > > Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
>>> > > > Destination queue = new AMQAnyDestination("ADDR:sajith_queue_test;
>>> > > {create:
>>> > > > always}");
>>> > > > MessageProducer producer = session.createProducer(queue);
>>> > > > TextMessage message = session.createTextMessage("created234");
>>> > > > producer.send(message);
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Receiver.java
>>> > > > ------------------
>>> > > > Connection connection = new AMQConnection("amqp://guest:guest@test
>>> > > > /?brokerlist='tcp://localhost:5672'");
>>> > > > Session session = connection.createSession(false,
>>> > > > Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
>>> > > > Destination queue = new AMQAnyDestination("ADDR:sajith_queue_test;
>>> > > {create:
>>> > > > always}");
>>> > > > MessageConsumer consumer = session.createConsumer(queue);
>>> > > > Message message = consumer.receive();
>>> > > > System.out.println("Receieved : " + message);
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > Does calling start() on the connection object before trying to
>>> receive
>>> > > help?
>>> > >
>>> > > -- Rob
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > Thanks Rob..! Yeah it works.. :)
>>> >
>>> > Now, why don't we require to invoke connection.start() of the sender?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> The JMS spec defines start() as relating only to the receiving of
>>> messages.
>>> Weird, I agree, but such is the specification.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>
>> Cool..! :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sajith
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Here, I'm expecting that receiver will consume the message which
>>> was
>>> > > > earlier sent by the Sender, but I don't get any messages printed in
>>> > > > Receiver's side.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I verified in Qpid-management console as well, there I can see that
>>> > queue
>>> > > > "sajith_queue_test" has been created, and shows following
>>> statistics,
>>> > > which
>>> > > > are of relevant
>>> > > >         MessageCount :                 1
>>> > > >         ReceivedMessagCount :      1
>>> > > >         ConsumerCount :                1
>>> > > >         ActiveConsumerCount :       0
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Seems consumer has not been active.. could this be a problem ?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Also, Im confused a bit, that is, in this way I'm sending and
>>> receiving
>>> > > > messages directly to the Queue, but not via an Exchange, isn't it?
>>> > > > According to the AMQP spec, as I
>>> > > > understood, we should deal with an Exchange, and based on the
>>> bindings
>>> > > only
>>> > > > messages are sent to the particular queues.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Appreciate if you could shed some light in order to get my
>>> confusions
>>> > > > sorted out..
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks
>>> > > > Sajith
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Gordon Sim <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > On 09/05/2012 07:55 AM, Sajith Kariyawasam wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >> Is it possible in Qpid, to create a queues dynamically, make
>>> those
>>> > > > >> queues persistent , and let subscribers subscribe to  it ?
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Yes. You can use an address of the form:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >   my-queue; {create:always, node:{durable:True}}
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > This can be used as the address for which you create a receiver
>>> in
>>> > the
>>> > > > > c++/python APIs, and as the configuration for the Destination
>>> object
>>> > > for
>>> > > > > which you create a MessageConsumer in JMS.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > If you haven't already done so, I would suggest reading
>>> > > > >
>>> > http://qpid.apache.org/books/**0.18/Programming-In-Apache-**Qpid/html/
>>> > > <
>>> > > > http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.18/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/
>>> > >which
>>> > > > has some more detail on the other capabilities of addressing.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > >
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected].**org<
>>> > > > [email protected]>
>>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > Best Regards
>>> > > > Sajith
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Best Regards
>>> > Sajith
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Sajith
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Sajith
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Sajith

Reply via email to