My real scene is such:
    client (broker,) = > (round robin) = > broker0, broker1, broker2

According to your opinion, i will try to use LVS/HAProxy to achieve

Thanks

2012/9/13 Gordon Sim [via Qpid] <[email protected]>

> On 09/13/2012 09:35 AM, Icey wrote:
> > I expect like this:
> >
> >     client  => (round robin) => broker0, broker1, broker2
> >
> > The client round-robin connect  to  broker0, broker1, broker2. In my
> opinion
> > federation does not support this.
>
> No it does not. However do you need the three brokers above to
> co-ordinate/communicate at all? E.g. if client 1 connects to broker 0
> and sends a message, should that message get to client 2 who happened to
> connect to broker 2?
>
> It is that inter-broker coordination that federation addresses.
>
> > Could you give some hint how to setup my expect ? I totally newbie in
> this
> > area.
>
> Qpid doesn't have anything itself to support that. However you could use
> a network level load-balancing technique, e.g.
> HAProxy(http://haproxy.1wt.eu/) or LVS
> (http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/FAQ).
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=7582032&i=0>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden 
> email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=7582032&i=1>
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Icey




-----
Icey
--
View this message in context: 
http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/How-to-cluster-qpid-brokers-for-load-balancing-tp7581971p7582077.html
Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to