Sounds good to me. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gordon Sim [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:12 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: mailing lists and fragmented communication > > On 01/18/2013 06:55 PM, Steve Huston wrote: > > I agree that the qpid and proton users should be on the same list. > > Also, it's useful for much of the development info to be open to the > > users list. My only concern for a second list is for things that > > committers may need to talk about but which the larger user community > > doesn't care about. For example, "who broke the build" or > > questions/issues about the release process, etc. > > I sympathise with the concern, and certainly don't want to impose irrelevant > emails on people. > > In practice I think the volume of messages is low and in my view at least, > unlikely to be a serious nuisance. > > I do think that having wider awareness of and involvement in the release > process would be a good thing for all of us. Sometimes even the 'who broke > the build' type mails can convey what is coming down the road and allow > users to comment or get involved earlier in the process. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
