Hi Bruno,
Since federation routes are uni-directional, you'd need to create another route
to get from b2 back to b1 for the response.
Here's a simple example using the 'drain' and 'spout' clients:
If I have two brokers:
qpidd --auth no -p 8888
qpidd --auth no -p 9999
And set up two routes, one in each direction:
qpid-route dynamic add 127.0.0.1:9999 127.0.0.1:8888 amq.direct
qpid-route dynamic add 127.0.0.1:8888 127.0.0.1:9999 amq.direct
Then, from different consoles I can send replies and responses:
(from 8888 ---> 9999)
./drain -f -b 127.0.0.1:9999 "amq.direct/request; {create:always}"
./spout -b 127.0.0.1:8888 --content "FOO" "amq.direct/request"
(from 9999 ---> 8888)
./drain -f -b 127.0.0.1:8888 "amq.direct/response; {create:always}"
./spout -b 127.0.0.1:9999 --content "FOO" "amq.direct/response"
-K
----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
>
> Imagine that I have two brokers, b1 and b2 that have a federation
> link
> witch sends every message from b1 amq.direct exchange to b2. b1 has a
> client connected that sends a request to amq.direct/requests with
> replyTo set to his local queue. b2 has a server connected that
> listens
> for requests in amq.direct/requests. The server receives the request,
> is
> it possible to send the reply to b1 queue as set in message replyTo
> property? If not, any suggestion to accomplish this?
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Bruno Matos
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]